I just upgraded from 1.33.7 to 1.34.0. After the upgrade I notice that under the "System Information" where the servers memory is listed, I suddenly have about 2GB less free memory than before - is this a bug? Here is a copy and paste of my current memory listings:
Total Memory 8051868 kB
Free Memory 1164116 kB
Total Swap Memory 2650684 kB
Free Swap Memory 2650608 kB
Notice that the "Free Memory" is just a little over 1GB, before the upgrade I usually had around 2.5 to 3GB Free Memory.
I am running Debian 5 with Apache 2.2.13 and PHP 5.2.11.
Have anybody else this problem after upgrading DirectAdmin?
Notice that the "Free Memory" is just a little over 1GB, before the upgrade I usually had around 2.5 to 3GB Free Memory.
hi floyd.
I have 4GB ram
One thing to note is that if you had 2.5 to 3 GB of Free Memory then that was just wasted money and ram. The memory should be close to 100% used all the time. Otherwise why even have it?
Because you have to start with 0 customers when you first start, hopefully I will fill the server with customers after the time goes!
The fact that it shows less free memory means that your server is using it more efficiently. There is a discussion of ram usage on this forum already. Let's not digress. I know I started the digression.
So far neither ditto or urgido have shown us how what DA reports is different from the operating system reports. So at this point we can only assume that DA is reporting it accurately.
But I have root access to the server, so if you explain the necessary steps to get that information, I can post it here. Also I am familiar with simple use of Putty.
top
free
******:~# free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 8051868 7759832 292036 0 226224 7053272
-/+ buffers/cache: 480336 7571532
Swap: 2650684 76 2650608
******:~#
******:~# top
top - 13:20:48 up 170 days, 19:07, 1 user, load average: 0.05, 0.04, 0.00
Tasks: 133 total, 1 running, 132 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.3%us, 0.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.4%id, 0.1%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 8051868k total, 7759676k used, 292192k free, 226176k buffers
Swap: 2650684k total, 76k used, 2650608k free, 7053232k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
20681 apache 20 0 43172 23m 5076 S 16 0.3 0:15.28 httpd
21214 apache 20 0 40776 20m 3652 S 1 0.3 0:02.18 httpd
20488 apache 20 0 38672 19m 5340 S 1 0.2 0:13.48 httpd
20781 apache 20 0 46332 26m 4992 S 1 0.3 0:07.16 httpd
21215 apache 20 0 38448 17m 4224 S 1 0.2 0:00.20 httpd
21233 root 20 0 8160 2680 2220 S 1 0.0 0:00.02 sshd
21277 root 20 0 6944 2532 2076 S 1 0.0 0:00.02 sshd
7 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 415:49.46 ksoftirqd/1
1 root 20 0 2100 688 588 S 0 0.0 5:49.61 init
2 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd
3 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:19.72 migration/0
4 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 270:35.70 ksoftirqd/0
5 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:04.96 watchdog/0
6 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:37.47 migration/1
8 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:04.04 watchdog/1
9 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:08.06 migration/2
10 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 12:51.32 ksoftirqd/2
Seems accurate to me. The exact numbers will change from second to second. But all 3 report about the same.
I don't find those URLs funny. You don't have to reply.
I am trying to learn as I go
should I be satisfied with them, or should I be worried?