Page 10 of 21 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 200 of 408

Thread: SpamBlocker-Powered exim.conf, Version 4

  1. #181
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    California
    Posts
    26,123
    Quote Originally Posted by iprodua View Post
    Hello. Why SB4 does not contain per user limits?
    does any body use something like this in exim.pl from NoBaloney?:

    PHP Code:
     if (open (LIMIT"/etc/virtual/limit_$name"))
            {
                    
    $email_limit int(<LIMIT>);
                    
    close(LIMIT);
            }
            else
            {
                    
    open (LIMIT"/etc/virtual/limit");
                    
    $email_limit int(<LIMIT>);
                    
    close(LIMIT);
            } 
    Where would I put this? What functionality does it add?

    Jeff
    +1 951 643-5345
    Third-Party DirectAdmin administration and support
    Dedicated Servers, Dedicated Reseller Accounts
    NoBaloney Internet Services div. Qnito Incorporated
    848 North Rainbow Blvd., Suite #3789
    Las Vegas, NV 89107-1103

  2. #182
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    6,641
    i thot user limit is managed from exim.pl not from conf, cause im using sb4 with latest exim.pl and limit per-user is working correctly.

    Regards
    SeLLeRoNe - Andrea Iannucci
    DevOps Engineer - System Administrator
    If you need my support write me an E-Mail to Support@CrazyNetwork.it

  3. #183
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    California
    Posts
    26,123
    You're right. As I keep telling myself, I no longer try to maintain my own exim.pl file.

    User iprodua did mention my exim.pl file; I should have just responded to use the one from DirectAdmin.

    Jeff
    +1 951 643-5345
    Third-Party DirectAdmin administration and support
    Dedicated Servers, Dedicated Reseller Accounts
    NoBaloney Internet Services div. Qnito Incorporated
    848 North Rainbow Blvd., Suite #3789
    Las Vegas, NV 89107-1103

  4. #184
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3

    Local users Unroutable

    After installing SB4, I noticed local users can no longer receive email. I also noticed local users always get the qualify domain added to their email address.

    Example:
    Joe is the user account for somedomain.net
    Email sent to joe@somedomain.net is bounced as Unroutable

    The directadmin mail queue shows
    A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
    recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

    joe@qualifydomain
    (ultimately generated from joe@somedomain.net)

    I read and re-read the readme, but don't have a clue what's going on here. I'm using DA 1.38 with it's exim.pl.

    Thanks for any help.
    Vern

  5. #185
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    California
    Posts
    26,123
    Does your server run Maildir/Dovecot?

    Spamblocker 4 requires that.

    Jeff
    +1 951 643-5345
    Third-Party DirectAdmin administration and support
    Dedicated Servers, Dedicated Reseller Accounts
    NoBaloney Internet Services div. Qnito Incorporated
    848 North Rainbow Blvd., Suite #3789
    Las Vegas, NV 89107-1103

  6. #186
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3
    Yes, and virtual email is delivered as expected.

  7. #187
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    California
    Posts
    26,123
    Post a log section for us, showing the email non-delivery.

    Jeff
    +1 951 643-5345
    Third-Party DirectAdmin administration and support
    Dedicated Servers, Dedicated Reseller Accounts
    NoBaloney Internet Services div. Qnito Incorporated
    848 North Rainbow Blvd., Suite #3789
    Las Vegas, NV 89107-1103

  8. #188
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    194
    Is there a changelog for what is new in sb4.1 ? .. http://www.nobaloney.net/downloads/s...pamBlocker4.1/
    Johannes

  9. #189
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    California
    Posts
    26,123
    There's only one change; I don't remember it right now but you can probably find it with a diff file. If not write back; perhaps I'll have time another day to create one.

    Jeff
    +1 951 643-5345
    Third-Party DirectAdmin administration and support
    Dedicated Servers, Dedicated Reseller Accounts
    NoBaloney Internet Services div. Qnito Incorporated
    848 North Rainbow Blvd., Suite #3789
    Las Vegas, NV 89107-1103

  10. #190
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    194
    got it in the exim mailinglist - thx 4 hint
    Johannes

  11. #191
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    California
    Posts
    26,123
    Got what in the exim mailing list?

    Jeff
    +1 951 643-5345
    Third-Party DirectAdmin administration and support
    Dedicated Servers, Dedicated Reseller Accounts
    NoBaloney Internet Services div. Qnito Incorporated
    848 North Rainbow Blvd., Suite #3789
    Las Vegas, NV 89107-1103

  12. #192
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    194
    On a post from 2008 (i cant remember link, forgot to save it) the hint to do a comparison against installed/compiled openssl against exim - i had a strange problem - only one or 2 from my customers was not able to send/receive emails. all checks i did was ok, no prob, i tried demo-accounts, all full ok. nothing in the log-files, nothing in verbose-mode. after days talking with other customers i got suspect that it depends on their ISPs.
    i called several ISP-technicians, only 1 was so friendly to support me with a log-line. the message was: my server finished connection after "HELO". that was it. with this "HELO" and the exim mailing list i found an old message from 2008 where was suggested to exim -bV to see running vs. compiled version from openSSL against exim.
    that was it.
    my error.
    i updated openssl, without compiling it against exim. got non reproducable errors, depending only on a few ISPs. haha.
    the hint was from you when i right remember, year2008 (sorry that i cant find link)

    edit:
    this was my way as i searched it:
    http://www.datadisk.co.uk/html_docs/...ery_errors.htm --> google --> http://www.exim.org/lurker/message/2...1cb6b5.en.html --> http://www.exim.org/lurker/message/2...822356.en.html --> found solution, started to work, forgotten to save link :-/
    Last edited by johannes; 05-01-2011 at 12:51 PM.
    Johannes

  13. #193
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    149
    Hi,
    i have put the latest spamblocker in a server and all the spam go to spam folder except many emails like this:

    Return-path: <>
    Envelope-to: nick@teten.gr
    Delivery-date: Sat, 07 May 2011 20:29:08 +0300
    Received: from mail by mail.teten.gr with spam-scanned (Exim 4.75)
    id 1QIlJU-0002Od-Ku
    for nick@teten.gr; Sat, 07 May 2011 20:29:08 +0300
    X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.teten.gr
    X-Spam-Flag: YES
    X-Spam-Level: ************
    X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=12.2 required=5.0 tests=EMPTY_MESSAGE,
    FH_FROMEML_NOTLD,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,FROM_NO_USER,FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,
    HELO_NO_DOMAIN,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=spam
    version=3.3.1
    X-Spam-Report:
    * 0.0 FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
    * 0.2 FH_FROMEML_NOTLD E-mail address doesn't have TLD (.com, etc.)
    * 2.6 FROM_NO_USER From: has no local-part before @ sign
    * 3.6 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
    * [117.204.100.80 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
    * 1.6 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
    * [117.204.100.80 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
    * 0.6 FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS Outlook can't send HTML in this format
    * 2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no
    * Subject: text
    * 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
    * 0.0 HELO_NO_DOMAIN Relay reports its domain incorrectly
    Received: from [117.204.100.80] (helo=naji)
    by mail.teten.gr with smtp (Exim 4.75)
    id 1QIlJU-0002OY-AX
    for nick@teten.gr; Sat, 07 May 2011 20:29:08 +0300
    Received: (qmail 2716 by uid 716); Sat, 7 May 2011 22:58:23 -0530
    From: "" <>
    To: <nick@teten.gr>
    Subject:
    Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 22:33:56 -0530
    Message-ID: <001e01cc0d0a$5b6c4cc0$1244e640$@com>
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001D_01CC0D0A.5B6C4CC0"
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
    Thread-Index: Acjvwj0OEyny0vcs01vqLHWsoc+tCg==
    Content-Language: en-us

    This is a multipart message in MIME format.

    ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01CC0D0A.5B6C4CC0
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="us-ascii"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit




    ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01CC0D0A.5B6C4CC0
    Content-Type: text/html;
    charset="us-ascii"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


    ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01CC0D0A.5B6C4CC0--
    As you ca nsee this emails is marked as spam but go to inbox, not t ospam folder.
    Also this emails have empty subject and sender.
    But why the spamblocker not send this to spam folder like the other spam emails?

  14. #194
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by blueice View Post
    Hi,
    i have put the latest spamblocker in a server and all the spam go to spam folder except many emails like this:



    As you ca nsee this emails is marked as spam but go to inbox, not t ospam folder.
    Also this emails have empty subject and sender.
    But why the spamblocker not send this to spam folder like the other spam emails?
    Same here... My users are complaining about empty messages, no sender address. I didnt have the chance to check the mail headers, but i assume it will be the same. Checking tomorrow if it actualy is.

  15. #195
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    338
    Hello

    Same here, but im not sure its spamblocker... i have not updated for a fiew weeks i think and it just started like 5 days ago.

    Spamassassin puts this as spam for me, so for the moment, i just delete them.

    Im the only one on the server receiving these.

    Sky

  16. #196
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    27
    Yes, we encounter similar cases with my 2 DA servers.
    The SpamAssassin has detected it to be high spam email and supposed to be deleted. But it is not.

    Can it be due to the empty sender?

  17. #197
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by YMTan View Post
    Yes, we encounter similar cases with my 2 DA servers.
    The SpamAssassin has detected it to be high spam email and supposed to be deleted. But it is not.

    Can it be due to the empty sender?

    I also have the same problem a few days...

  18. #198
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    338
    After checking logs a bit more :
    2011-05-09 15:47:37 1QJQoD-0003g5-Ba <= <> H=221-85-93-178.pool.ukrtel.net (home.home) [178.93.85.221] P=smtp S=969 id=005801cc0e68$d3e1f3d0$7ba5db70$@com T="" from <> for sky__AT__goetic.fr
    2011-05-09 15:47:37 cwd=/var/spool/exim 3 args: /usr/sbin/exim -Mc 1QJQoD-0003g5-Ba
    2011-05-09 15:47:37 cwd=/tmp 4 args: /usr/sbin/exim -oMr spam-scanned -bS
    2011-05-09 15:47:40 212.27.42.2 whitelisted in list.dnswl.org
    If i understand right, that IP is whitelisted...

  19. #199
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    California
    Posts
    26,123
    The SpamBlocker powered eixm.conf file offers both blocking through RBLs, and SpamAssassin. If the blocklists are working the spam isn't even getting to the server. So it it's being marked as spam but is still being delivered, that's an issue with SpamAssassin.

    The SpamBlocker powered exim.conf file can be configured to call SpamAssassin, but it doesn't configure it; that's your job.

    Jeff
    +1 951 643-5345
    Third-Party DirectAdmin administration and support
    Dedicated Servers, Dedicated Reseller Accounts
    NoBaloney Internet Services div. Qnito Incorporated
    848 North Rainbow Blvd., Suite #3789
    Las Vegas, NV 89107-1103

  20. #200
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2
    NoBaloney,

    Thanks for the new release. I've been running off of SpamBlocker 2.0 and was getting hacked more times than needed. And the crazy part is the lack of spam when I'm not even using SpamAssassin.

    Thanks again,

    Robert

Page 10 of 21 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Which version of Exim is SpamBlocker compatible with?
    By Christopher in forum SpamBlocker4
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-04-2013, 11:40 AM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-23-2012, 04:40 PM
  3. SpamBlocker-Powered exim.conf Version 4 changelog
    By nobaloney in forum SpamBlocker4
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-19-2011, 02:51 PM
  4. Spamblocker Version
    By chrisrandell in forum SpamBlocker
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-03-2009, 04:36 PM
  5. Turning Spamblocker on in exim.conf
    By louie55 in forum E-Mail
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-31-2005, 06:19 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •