custombuild 2.0

I didnt test on downgrade, going to do that right now.

What version i should change in version.txt? dovecot:2.2.1 to dovecot:2.1 would be ok?

Regards
 
The fact it happen just on 3 users make me think that should not be related to the update.. but the strange part is that is started just after this update (and no others), so, what else should be?

Regards
 
Here are the headers, one sent to same domain one to gmail

Code:
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: by 10.182.137.166 with SMTP id qj6csp118684obb;
        Fri, 17 May 2013 05:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.180.205.206 with SMTP id li14mr33579120wic.33.1368794720802;
        Fri, 17 May 2013 05:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>
Received: from SERVER-HOSTNAME (SERVER-HOSTNAME. [SERVER-IP])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x45si10825419eew.156.2013.05.17.05.45.20
        for <[email protected]>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Fri, 17 May 2013 05:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of owner-chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN designates SERVER-IP as permitted sender) client-ip=SERVER-IP;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of owner-chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN designates SERVER-IP as permitted sender) smtp.mail=owner-chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN;
       dkim=pass header.i=@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=CUSTOMER-DOMAIN; s=x;
	h=Date:From:Message-Id; bh=/vViaRHw8ZGnD6AoCEffkLmmTS0n3vPt23zthopd6L4=;
	b=dQkfxxHqUT6A0t6lCydlZLO0/MlWi3Mb71U9NFavpJaHAi5L68lf0+mf3gWhmcU85lt56E8yfUGExKSrYQxiDVVFNr3F++1RihMP/N7R1RSI5LAm2DxvBefSWj9mVWKzoFYZYZ027zvuhOOPYyWw9EkEut7YOdwwTHr+co6nPWORSY2kxIUXA2tCHNcWESCUSTGdNnCsFgSGrqfPuTQht0XdopW9XhMzqGviQKOMp3CJxnjof4pKIAxdtf9nHFv3rONRfTY7e84qhT4Oom/imhlVitgPPv7Wp/yXD/uj7V69j92UMDlk/FY0xzzAsRfldLzcfaEoC6Kd7Z7nxr/1AA==;
Received: from root by SERVER-HOSTNAME with local (Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <owner-chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>)
	id 1UdK2B-0002L3-GI
	for [email protected]; Fri, 17 May 2013 14:45:19 +0200
X-Sieve: Pigeonhole Sieve 0.4.0
X-Sieve-Redirected-From: drasno@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN
Delivered-To: <drasno@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>
 Received: from SERVER-HOSTNAME
 	by SERVER-HOSTNAME (Dovecot) with LMTP id GWHzF/glllFjGQAAkkTFOA
 	for <drasno@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>; Fri, 17 May 2013 14:45:19 +0200
 Received: from majordomo by SERVER-HOSTNAME with local (Exim 4.80.1)
 	(envelope-from <owner-chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>)
 	id 1UdK1x-0001zc-3M
 	for chat-out@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN; Fri, 17 May 2013 14:45:05 +0200
 Received: from ppp-225-19.21-151.libero.it ([151.21.19.225] helo=[127.0.0.1])
 	by SERVER-HOSTNAME with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
 	(Exim 4.80.1)
 	(envelope-from <perian@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>)
 	id 1UdK1w-0001yl-Ua
 	for chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN; Fri, 17 May 2013 14:45:05 +0200
 Message-ID: <51962650.2040600@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>
 Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 14:45:04 +0200
 From: Pietro/Perian <perian@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>
 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 To: chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN
 Subject: [chat] Prova per DRASNO 17 05 13
 References: <[email protected]> <FAA706B7BBF245D2900956D9E61AA8BD@VOSTRO> <CAPSbCdShFmqs-8Rx=WHVW71qJ9utgu9brDsBaea9kUKdnNQ8Fg@mail.gmail.com> <5194B048.4000008@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN> <99EB7C5FAECF4CC79B401BBA5AFE7756@VOSTRO> <5194B346.9010501@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN> <5194C763.3090803@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN> <51961718.5000300@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>
 In-Reply-To: <51961718.5000300@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130516-1, 16/05/2013), Outbound message
 X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
 X-Antivirus-Scanner: Seems clean.  You should still use an Antivirus Scanner
 Sender: owner-chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN
 Precedence: bulk
 Reply-To: chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN
 
 PROVA MAIL
Message-Id: <E1UdK2B-0002L3-GI@SERVER-HOSTNAME>
From: owner-chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 14:45:19 +0200

INGORATE QUESTA MAIL

17 05 13
14 44

and

Code:
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: by 10.182.137.166 with SMTP id qj6csp118685obb;
        Fri, 17 May 2013 05:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.180.88.162 with SMTP id bh2mr8203838wib.3.1368794723617;
        Fri, 17 May 2013 05:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>
Received: from SERVER-HOSTNAME (SERVER-HOSTNAME. [SERVER-IP])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p49si16402260eeu.238.2013.05.17.05.45.22
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Fri, 17 May 2013 05:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of owner-chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN designates SERVER-IP as permitted sender) client-ip=SERVER-IP;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of owner-chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN designates SERVER-IP as permitted sender) smtp.mail=owner-chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN;
       dkim=pass header.i=@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=CUSTOMER-DOMAIN; s=x;
	h=Reply-To:Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=U7u/ZNfzAyre3bfshDC9Cvu76iFqYwc7S5gPTylKEvs=;
	b=n2zApOfNLtnt7JynSFI3jNlR0phyZnFgM4II6zMz3INCzxWBTBCa3Lw0k6n07WcszddYLT02ajPStIHRpL22ws8PN27OZPel1KW4zHCypaftxtLUyiUdQK4RhUAa6HsGOp6Zx8o3aTRGpg8HhPDrfbo5sOb0ggCf9jvqW+hbBs4R55MvXcX7pbs1MNUOv4TLTuRLGKLeeU9/5fbcCWOov8OxCnY1LgS0aYFIDROICJBD06dxmwgJBYTrBAWlPctCouQI6ADgAN8Rcftba8Wvq3bcOOD5RzSHantTSnPkay0DdVJYrVaDmL9b5a8PfxDzW6tCpEJfgaZKeuBOdrSX1A==;
Received: from majordomo by SERVER-HOSTNAME with local (Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <owner-chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>)
	id 1UdK1x-0001zc-3M
	for chat-out@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN; Fri, 17 May 2013 14:45:05 +0200
Received: from ppp-225-19.21-151.libero.it ([151.21.19.225] helo=[127.0.0.1])
	by SERVER-HOSTNAME with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <perian@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>)
	id 1UdK1w-0001yl-Ua
	for chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN; Fri, 17 May 2013 14:45:05 +0200
Message-ID: <51962650.2040600@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 14:45:04 +0200
From: Pietro/Perian <perian@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN
Subject: [chat] Prova per DRASNO 17 05 13
References: <[email protected]> <FAA706B7BBF245D2900956D9E61AA8BD@VOSTRO> <CAPSbCdShFmqs-8Rx=WHVW71qJ9utgu9brDsBaea9kUKdnNQ8Fg@mail.gmail.com> <5194B048.4000008@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN> <99EB7C5FAECF4CC79B401BBA5AFE7756@VOSTRO> <5194B346.9010501@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN> <5194C763.3090803@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN> <51961718.5000300@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>
In-Reply-To: <51961718.5000300@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130516-1, 16/05/2013), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Seems clean.  You should still use an Antivirus Scanner
Sender: owner-chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: chat@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN

PROVA MAIL
INGORATE QUESTA MAIL

17 05 13
14 44

Regards
 
And what subject should they have?

And what are exim logs? Strange to see here:

Code:
X-Sieve: Pigeonhole Sieve 0.4.0
X-Sieve-Redirected-From: drasno@CUSTOMER-DOMAIN

Are you sure, that subject is not rewritten with a Sieve rule after it was sent by majordomo?
 
I didnt test on downgrade, going to do that right now.

What version i should change in version.txt? dovecot:2.2.1 to dovecot:2.1 would be ok?

Regards

Code:
cd /usr/local/directadmin/custombuild
./build update
./build set autover no
perl -pi -e 's#[COLOR=#000000]dovecot:2.2.1:6628f513ca841846176e81db870052f8#dovecot:2.1.16:#' versions.txt
[/COLOR]./build dovecot
 
Seeing the header the subject is there, but not when they see the email: Subject: [chat] Prova per DRASNO 17 05 13

Since is a ML ive checked the exim log with exigrep, the one thing i saw is the list of email that has been sent with no error and with "Complete" at the end.

Regarding the Sieve line, yes i did suspect of that too but no rules has been change/made from yesterday to today as far as i know, will ask to the customer for sure aswell.

Martynas, just downgraded Dovecot and told to customer to try again, i'll know if it is solved with this soon.

Regards
 
Last edited:
Back
Top