Hello all, i have issue with spam getting through. I am using the latest build of exim, exim config and SpamAssassin.
SpamAssassin is working in general because mail is being marked spam and sent to user spam folder but issue is that few of them are not marked spam.
My spam thresh hold is set to 5
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 // This is clearly not correct, should be higher, similar messages have score of 5.8 but in this case very low.
SpamTally: Final spam score: 6 // Final score is above 5 so this mail should be marked as spam but not.
Points for failing few tests is 0, i think points should be added in those cases.
Any idea how to fix this.
Thanks for your time.
SpamAssassin is working in general because mail is being marked spam and sent to user spam folder but issue is that few of them are not marked spam.
My spam thresh hold is set to 5
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from server1.mydomain.com
by server1.mydomain.com with LMTP id ONBwNm9RjllZCAAAGPd+5w
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:53:03 -0600
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:53:03 -0600
Received: from [194.67.194.239] (helo=gyesculch.faith)
by server1.mydomain.com with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1dgKfk-0000oS-AY
for [email protected]; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:53:03 -0600
From: "Mildred" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 19:41:39 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Date Easy with English Speaking Russian and Ukrainian Women
To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <9DeLmqvSlJuz7rmh9I9gV5g6wtRwrfwzixfDKiK8kuU.g5DnQ5pxA7aCPSegsfVBcpDUdBq44XIElrjhsJ8pyLw@gyesculch.faith>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------01942973284446684151705"
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "server1.mydomain.com",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: breadandbutter I out Sheriff you me over by first Miss wall
on of hanged very the travelling friend innocence dead to trousers my seemed
was the idea use glass took broke Pip on blue hair was OpE my powerfully
I parlour and easing Judging her even for it way and consider all than been
When following the on my paper his In R OPE at you had up divorced tell wouldnt
myself aint pretended or OpE washing all mouth night [...]
Content analysis details: (0.6 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: gyesculch.faith]
0.0 T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR SPF: test of HELO record failed (permerror)
0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror)
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
SpamTally: Final spam score: 6
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 // This is clearly not correct, should be higher, similar messages have score of 5.8 but in this case very low.
SpamTally: Final spam score: 6 // Final score is above 5 so this mail should be marked as spam but not.
Points for failing few tests is 0, i think points should be added in those cases.
Any idea how to fix this.
Thanks for your time.