Mike Healan
Verified User
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2003
- Messages
- 19
I'm starting to get verification requests from spamarrest.com again after having filtered that domain in the email control panel.
Here is a header from one of them.
Return-path: <>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:21:27 -0600
Received: from [66.150.163.174] (helo=spamarrest.com)
by www50.dixiesys.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
id 1AlcWN-00016L-Mh
for [email protected]; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:21:27 -0600
Received: from [66.150.163.164] (HELO m10)
by spamarrest.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6)
with ESMTP id 50158508 for [email protected]; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:21:26 -0800
Message-ID: <1473373.1075245686964.JavaMail.root@m10>
From: "Total-Harmony.Com" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Total-Harmony.Com" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: hello (verification)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Errors-to: [email protected]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_1042656_11707304.1075245686962"
X-Spamarrest-noauth: 1
X-Spamarrest-speedcode:
Precedence: auto_reply
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:21:26 -0800
Here is a header from one of them.
Return-path: <>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:21:27 -0600
Received: from [66.150.163.174] (helo=spamarrest.com)
by www50.dixiesys.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
id 1AlcWN-00016L-Mh
for [email protected]; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:21:27 -0600
Received: from [66.150.163.164] (HELO m10)
by spamarrest.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6)
with ESMTP id 50158508 for [email protected]; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:21:26 -0800
Message-ID: <1473373.1075245686964.JavaMail.root@m10>
From: "Total-Harmony.Com" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Total-Harmony.Com" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: hello (verification)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Errors-to: [email protected]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_1042656_11707304.1075245686962"
X-Spamarrest-noauth: 1
X-Spamarrest-speedcode:
Precedence: auto_reply
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:21:26 -0800