Some spam messages (example below) are never handed over to SA to even check them. I see the fake spam/AV scan headers were inserted. Is there a directive for Exim, so that it would strip or ignore all headers like these? Is this normal behaviour for SB3?
Using SpamBlocker3, default config.
Using SpamBlocker3, default config.
Code:
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to: system-filter
Delivery-date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 03:47:18 +0200
Received: from mail.conecta.it ([195.43.161.220])
by XXX with esmtp (Exim 4.68)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1KX4hH-00037n-LS
for XXX; Sun, 24 Aug 2008 03:47:16 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mail.conecta.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB661E40BE6
for <XXX>; Sun, 24 Aug 2008 03:47:11 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.371
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.371 tagged_above=-10 required=4
tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.conecta.it ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.conecta.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id cVf9icIAHdEj for
...