Search results

Hoi Richard, Thank you for your regards on this. My fix is the only one that is good (for me). Why? As said: I want to accept updates to the script. I can't use a custom script as that may break things. If I had to fix the IPv6 thing I would consider to use the custom folder, but in the script...

@Zhenyapan Did you not read my comment? https://forum.directadmin.com/threads/letsencrypt-could-not-start-http-server-for-challenge-listen-tcp-80-bind-address-already-in-use.70150/post-372511 >> I do not want to make the script readonly I do want to keep receiving updates from DA and not break...

They are running a distro which is NOT YET end of life and supported by Direct Admin (RHEL 7). OS Name OS EOL Date DirectAdmin EOL Date Comment RHEL 7 June 2024 September 2024 glibc 2.17, kernel 3.10 They are being migrated (as planned) to a new distro/server and this will all go away...

Nice of you to let me know your thought. Still it is strange DA is doing micro updates and then every time overwrites a script which is in use every day. And I could 'fix' it with chattr or something like that, but then I would not get any updates for this script and might have new problems. I...

@fln Every update of DA I have to repair the letsencrypt script. Why can't this been fixed on your end? I am now thinking of writing a cron script to make the change when needed, on a daily basis. Do end users need to patch on a daily basis? Can you please fix this.

@DA when will you fix this? I have to keep editing the script over and over as you keep overwriting it? I do not want to make the script readonly, since I do not want to make it go outdated.

I am seeing errors on letsencrypt I am having more and more domains, over different servers, going into 'negative days to renewal' if you look at the number of days for renewal. The latest ./build letsencrypt does not download a new version of scripts/letsencrypt.sh The letsencrypt.sh script...

Having the same error I followed the outline above. The error: rfc2047.c: (.text+0x49f): undefined reference to `libiconv_open' rfc2047.c: (.text+0x543): undefined reference to `libiconv' rfc2047.c: (.text+0x5f2): undefined reference to `libiconv_close' doExim: failed to compile...

Sorry Richard, there was a typo! I did not and will not add server.domain.com as a domain on subdomain on this server! should be I did not and will not add server.domain.com as a domain or subdomain on this server! This also means you interpreted this incorrect and...

2024 January. New install. Had to do this manually. The steps below explain why this must be done manually. imho. I had no DNS entry for my localhost (server.domain.com), and could not generate the dkim. grep dkim directadmin.conf directadmin.conf:dkim=2 ! the setting is already set, so no need...

I leave my text above for others to find via a search engine. Case closed.

One more detail. I had placed the certificate in PEM format (the text format "BEGIN CERTIFICATE" thing) in /usr/local/directadmin/data/users/username/domains/mutual.testdomein.nl.pem and I referred to it SSLCACertificateFile...

After several days of trying out many things I decided to try it on a different O.S. and it worked immediately. So thank you Debian for not solving this problem. I found similar or exact the same problems in 2013 and 2017 and only on Debian systems (they seem related to http 2.0 for some...

I am having a hard time getting this to work. To set up a (sub) domain which will ask the end user for a certificate. (I think) I know what is needed. * I created a pem file containing the 4 certificates which I received. No extra spaces and such, and ordered from top to root (I know the order...

I am seeing the same on many of my servers, the reject and mail log are growing insane because of these mail attacks. What the hackers do is they send 100 mails in 1 second, and each and every line is blocked by cbl.abuseat.org (127.0.0.2) which is okay of course. But at an increasing rate, I do...

1.647 shows Option "allow_subdomain_docroot_override" is removed, changing subdomain document root will be always allowed.

It has not been maintained for a while, and you may get stuck on it as it is no longer working or not working correctly. Better take no risk! The reason behind the 'why' is that it is a choice of DA, to continue developing the evolution skin and degrade/remove the old one(s). All I can say is...

* email profile popup is not there Am I the only one? When I go (on any) server to check this option (#apple-specific-configuration-profile-for-e-mail-accounts), I first enter the evolution skin with the :2222/evo/ path, and then I go to the mailboxes. I do see the [+] option, however it...

I am trying to get used to evolution, but it has a terrible responsiveness. In terms if user interface. I tried reading logfiles. Setting the number of lines is jerky. And then scrolling is almost impossible. Sometimes it scrolls, and often not. Forcing you to open the result in a new window to...

Closing words from @fln to me: Licensing checks happens after 2 minutes of DA start, but then it is extended exponentially and happens only once every ~4 hours after DA is running for a while. It does not matter how many child processes are started, only one process checks the license validity...