5.4 Release VS Stable

rndinit0

Verified User
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
98
So I know this has been covered countless of times.

As far as stability and security is concerned:

Should I be going for Release ? Or Stable ? Branches of FreeBSD.

Also if Im runing 5.x Stable then shouldnt uname -a say Stable ?

FreeBSD xxx.xxx.net 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Sun May 8 10:21:06 UTC 2005 root@harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
Or is 5.4 Release == to Stable

Is 5.4 Stable even available yet ?

(Forgive the confusin its been a while)
 

Chrysalis

Verified User
Joined
Aug 25, 2004
Messages
1,584
Location
uk
There is another branch you havent mentioned which I think should be used on web server production boxes.

5.4 Release - Default on 5.4 installations.
5.4 Security branch - Release with critical fixes and security patches. - I reccomend this branch - Uname looks like this 5.4-RELEASE-p6
5.4 STABLE - The latest tested code, but more risky then the above branch since it is not been tested for release quality. - Uname looks like this 5.4-STABLE

The STABLE branch isnt bound to a release so when 5.4 got released 5.3-STABLE becomes 5.4-STABLE so as such 5.4-RELEASE is newer code then 5.3-STABLE.
 

rndinit0

Verified User
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
98
Thanks for the tip. I did see somethin bout a security branch, but didnt think much of it. Now that youve highlighted it for me however looks like Ill give it a go.
 

rndinit0

Verified User
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
98
portaudit -Fda auditfile.tbz 100% of 28 kB 73 kBps New database installed. Database created: Tue Aug 9 14:40:12 EDT 2005 0 problem(s) in your installed packages found.
FreeBSD server 5.4-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p6 #0: Tue Aug 9 06:32:29 EDT 2005 root@core.liquidmemory.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
*grins*

Only one problem... now im not sure what I love more... DirectAdmin, or the D.A. community =P
 
Top