S SEO Guru Verified User Joined Feb 14, 2013 Messages 49 Today at 1:48 PM #1 I am wondering why Brute Force Monitor is adding entries in csf.deny instead of using csf command to ban through iptables directly. Wouldnt this be a more neat integration?
I am wondering why Brute Force Monitor is adding entries in csf.deny instead of using csf command to ban through iptables directly. Wouldnt this be a more neat integration?
S SEO Guru Verified User Joined Feb 14, 2013 Messages 49 Today at 1:50 PM #2 By the way CSF is still good tech. Love you guys keep maintaining it. Thanks!
O Ohm J Verified User Joined Aug 16, 2019 Messages 2,092 Today at 10:41 PM #3 The fact, they still use the command, but only use the perm block instead of temp block when setting BFM to ban on the timing like 1hr.
The fact, they still use the command, but only use the perm block instead of temp block when setting BFM to ban on the timing like 1hr.