LawsHosting
Verified User
We should be able to turn these off...... Besides, it doesn't make sense: packages ?? to 1 upgradable packagesSystem packages to 1 upgradable packages update is available.
We should be able to turn these off...... Besides, it doesn't make sense: packages ?? to 1 upgradable packagesSystem packages to 1 upgradable packages update is available.
Thanks for your comment though its just strange.An update is released with two small improvements:
The real purpose of CB reporting system package updates is mainly to nudge server owners into keeping system up to date and investigate potential package upgrade conflicts. Not to try and take over OS upgrading task from admins
- after patching CSF, firewall rules will be recreated if CSF is actually being used on the system and IPv6 is enabled
- reporting system upgrades available in CB will exclude potential obsolete package changes (when some package needs to be removed and replaced by multiple packages).
.
@sahostking, WHMCS integration on our test servers works fine. Maybe you are using some 3rd party WHMCS plugins/apps?
POST
request when logging-in via auto login URLs. Same ones that can be generated from CLI via da login-url
command. The auto login URLs were designed to work with GET
requests (meaning URL is just pasted in the browser). However older DA versions used to accept POST
requests as well. The fix we have released restores backwards compatibility and again allows POST
requests to be used. This is a workaround the real fix should come from WHMCS module developers to start using GET
requests for auto login-in URLs (not to be confused with normal login which must use POST
method).Thanks. It was a typo with flipped from/to versions.Was this a downgrade or a typo?
Well, on Debian, even when I issue a system upgrade, I still getFor "upgradable packages" message, I actually find it quite useful.
System packages to 1 upgradable packages update is available.
On Debian, the command is apt list --upgradableWell, on Debian, even when I issue a system upgrade, I still get
Meh
On Debian, the command is apt list --upgradable
What do you have then?
linux-image-amd64/oldstable 4.19+105+deb10u19 amd64 [upgradable from: 4.19+105+deb10u17]
The following packages have been kept back: linux-image-amd64
Can you specify why that is a bug? If you are logged in as user, you shouldn't be able to select between users as this is an admin function.The option to quickly select between users at the top stops working.
No worries.Ah oke, we left installatron for softaculous long ago, but we don't use Evo either so we don't use that function. However I now understand exactly which part you're talking about. That might be a bug indeed. Thanks for explaining.