up2date not working properly

spirit

Verified User
Joined
Nov 27, 2004
Messages
177
Location
Germany - Bremen
Hi All,

After I have gotten a fresh installation of DA on my webserver I experience some troubles with up2date.

At the moment the following is presented after giving the command;

--copy&paste--

[root@marnix scripts]# up2date -u

http://fedora.redhat.com/download/up2date-mirrors/fedora-core-2

using mirror: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/2/i386/os/

http://fedora.redhat.com/download/up2date-mirrors/updates-released-fc2

using mirror: http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/pub/fedora/updates/2/i386/



Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: fedora-core-2...



Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: updates-released-fc2...



Fetching rpm headers...

########################################



Name Version Rel

----------------------------------------------------------

GConf2 2.6.0 7 i386

ORBit2 2.10.0 4 i386

bind-utils 9.2.3 13 i386

bison 1.875c 1 i386

cvs 1.11.17 2 i386

cyrus-sasl 2.1.18 2.2 i386

cyrus-sasl-devel 2.1.18 2.2 i386

cyrus-sasl-md5 2.1.18 2.2 i386

cyrus-sasl-plain 2.1.18 2.2 i386

dhclient 3.0.1rc14 1 i386

dump 0.4b39 1.FC2 i386

fam 2.6.10 9.FC2 i386

fam-devel 2.6.10 9.FC2 i386

finger 0.17 24 i386

gd 2.0.21 5.20.1 i386

glib2 2.4.8 1.fc2 i386

glibc 2.3.3 27.1 i686

glibc-common 2.3.3 27.1 i386

glibc-devel 2.3.3 27.1 i386

glibc-headers 2.3.3 27.1 i386

gtk2 2.4.14 1.fc2 i386

hotplug 2004_04_01 1.1 i386

hwdata 0.120 1 noarch

iiimf-client-lib 11.4 46.1.svn1587 i386

iiimf-client-lib-devel 11.4 46.1.svn1587 i386

iiimf-protocol-lib 11.4 46.1.svn1587 i386

iiimf-protocol-lib-devel 11.4 46.1.svn1587 i386

info 4.7 4 i386

initscripts 7.55.2 1 i386

krb5-devel 1.3.6 1 i386

krb5-libs 1.3.6 1 i386

kudzu 1.1.68.2 1 i386

kudzu-devel 1.1.68.2 1 i386

lha 1.14i 14.1 i386

libbonobo 2.6.2 1 i386

libgnome 2.6.0 3 i386

libpcap 0.8.3 6.FC2.1 i386

libpng 1.2.8 1.fc2 i386

libtiff 3.5.7 22.fc2 i386

libuser 0.52.5 0.FC2.1 i386

libuser-devel 0.52.5 0.FC2.1 i386

libxml2 2.6.16 2 i386

libxml2-devel 2.6.16 2 i386

libxml2-python 2.6.16 2 i386

libxslt 1.1.12 2 i386

man 1.5o1 6 i386

net-tools 1.60 25.1 i386

nfs-utils 1.0.6 22 i386

nscd 2.3.3 27.1 i386

pango 1.4.1 1 i386

pcmcia-cs 3.2.7 1.8.2.2 i386

popt 1.9.1 0.4.1 i386

ppp 2.4.2 5.2.FC2 i386

procps 3.2.0 1.2 i386

rmt 0.4b39 1.FC2 i386

rpm 4.3.1 0.4.1 i386

rpm-build 4.3.1 0.4.1 i386

rpm-devel 4.3.1 0.4.1 i386

rpm-python 4.3.1 0.4.1 i386

rsync 2.6.2 1.fc2.0 i386

shadow-utils 4.0.3 55 i386

slang 1.4.9 12 i386

slang-devel 1.4.9 12 i386

strace 4.5.5 1 i386

system-config-network-tui 1.3.17 0.FC2.1 noarch

tcpdump 3.8.2 6.FC2.1 i386

texinfo 4.7 4 i386

tzdata 2005c 1.fc2 noarch

vim-minimal 6.3.054 0.fc2.1 i386

wget 1.9.1 16.fc2 i386

xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL 6.7.0 11 i386

xorg-x11-libs 6.7.0 11 i386

xorg-x11-libs-data 6.7.0 11 i386

zip 2.3 26.2 i386

zlib 1.2.1.2 0.fc2 i386

zlib-devel 1.2.1.2 0.fc2 i386





Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies...

There was a package dependency problem. The message was:



To solve all dependencies for the RPMs you have selected, The following

packages you have marked to exclude would have to be added to the set:



Package Name Reason For Skipping

======================================================================

bind-9.2.3-13 Config modified

bind-9.2.3-13 Config modified

bind-9.2.3-13 Config modified

bind-9.2.3-13 Config modified



Unresolvable chain of dependencies:

bind 9.2.1-16 requires libdns.so.5

bind 9.2.1-16 requires libisc.so.4

--end of copy&paste--

It doesn´t seem to update anything at all. However, since it is a fresh install it surely should. Anyone have a solution? I don´t seem to get it. That bind-part isn´t used on my system, i use ´named´.

Thanx in advance for any helpfull replies.

Spirit.
 
try adding bind to the ignore list for up2date (up2date -c )

and then it won't try to download bind. not really sure though
 
It doesn´t seem to update anything at all. However, since it is a fresh install it surely should. Anyone have a solution? I don´t seem to get it. That bind-part isn´t used on my system, i use ´named´.
Uhhm, nope... Bind and Named are the exact same thing :)

BIND is the project name and named the name of the actual executable doing the work, if not mistaken...

BUt indeed, adding it to the ignore list would have most effect.
 
Back
Top