Update Directadmin on Centos 5

[Bonny90]

Hello!
I am working on an old Centos 5 server, which is end-of-life OS, but I need to update php version at least,

so when I run : ./build update
I keep getting this error : " version of cwaf_rules not found in versions_cwaf.txt! "

and when I try to install new version : ./build php d
I get this error : " webp/decode.h not found "
although ./build libwebp succeeds.

Any ideas ??

 

[Richard G]

but I need to update php version at least,

Since even Centos 6 is already EOL for some time, I'm wondering what people are still doing with such old OS which ofcourse will run into issues at some point.

However, as far as I can see from the error notice, seems you're having issues with Comodo.
Same as in this thread:

Version of cwaf rules not found in versions cwaf.txt

Today got this error when updating: ./custombuild.tar.gz 100%[=========================================================================================================>] 254.58K 499KB/s in 0.5s 2021-04-17 10:17:33 (499 KB/s) - './custombuild.tar.gz' saved...

forum.directadmin.com

As for the libwebp I don't have an idea, maybe you can disable webp support.

 

[Bonny90]

Hello!
I am working on an old Centos 5 server, which is end-of-life OS, but I need to update php version at least,

so when I run : ./build update
I keep getting this error : " version of cwaf_rules not found in versions_cwaf.txt! "
https://19216801.onl/ https://routerlogin.uno/
and when I try to install new version : ./build php d
I get this error : " webp/decode.h not found "
although ./build libwebp succeeds.

Any ideas ??

I got this,...

 

[Richard G]

We know you got that.

Please don't quote complete posts.
Did you try what I said and did it help?

 

[ccto]

I guess the cURL in CentOS 5 cannot support TLS 1.2 , and failed to establish HTTPS connection.

 

[Richard G]

Let'ss see if there comes a proper response. Often when no reply is done to a solution and only the original message is quoted with an "i got this" statement, it's a spammer or spammer bot. So a decent reply could rule that out.

As for the issue, you're probably right. Centos 5 is already declared EOL by DA too, so shouldn't be used anymore in any case.