Search results

Yes you can, but not on Ubuntu 24.04. Only lower versions.

Oh then that is probably the reason it works well with you. I don't have a helo_data file on any server. That's not a default setup but a customisation if I'm correct. Normally this is not required. But I do have a /etc/virtual/server.example.com (so hostname) folder on every server. Which...

Hostnames are never called subdomains. They look like subdomains but never called that way. If you create real subdomains for your hostname, that might be possible and working but would be an odd way to work with hostnames. They should normally not be subdomains. So be aware to use correct terms...

Yes you both, that's what I said. The OS provides the updates until EOL of the OS support. ;) So older OS can have older Bind which is still save.

Bind is installed by DA installation but is -not- part of DA it's part of the OS. So if you want OS packages updated, you need to update your OS. I'm not sure if this can be done by the Custombuild GUI too, I thought yes, but I never use the GUI. On RHEL and related, login to your system via...

Where do you set an FQDN DNS record if DA is not installed yet? In the registrar DNS? And this is the issue. Setting a DNS hostname record should -also- be done by DA automatically (in DA DNS) on installation as they did in the older days. Then the problem would be not occur. I've used the same...

I also found this a bad idea. But DA found it a good idea as this way people were intantly able to visit the panel via SSL without the need to having knowledge about hostnames. There are people using it this way. But we have had way more people who did not benefit from doing up a bit of...

One line should be sufficient for that once everything is setup correctly (also in this doc): /usr/local/directadmin/scripts/letsencrypt.sh server_cert There are 2 ways, just use the hostname from DA and mention the hostname in the server domain. However, I've not seen server ssl and dkim for...

Ah you didn't mention that. Maybe nextime mentiono when using cloudflare. Glad to read you got it fixed now.

Normally yes unless you also have DKIM. Often then it will be seen that it was send by the original sender. However if you than also have DMARC, it will fail again since SPF and DKIM won't match for example. There is no SPF fail. He only shows a DMARC fail because of DKIM fail. SPF shows pass...

You just informed me you did get a /96 so it should be /96 then. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Oh sorry, you don't know that part. This is what I'm talking about, but we had a pm exchange in which I pointed that out and then he told me he in fact had a /64 subnet and he also did not understand where that /96 came from. ;) Unless I understood him wrongly? @Niels90 can you confirm or did...

Are you sure that is correct? Because he has a /64 subnet and this is a /96. Should it not be like this then? ip -6 addr add 2a06:900:201:bb01::951/64 dev eno1 preferred_lft forever But this is OS change, this will not change the DA ip's right? So should the ip not also be disconnected from the...

It does work in RHEL 10 as I've read, but you have to turn of IPSET, because ipset is not working in RHEL 10.

DA does not use the enterprise version but the normal version, so Juli 2026! There is a very slight chance they grant us connection to the OS version of Alma 9 which is 10.5 and then we could get the OS updates of MariaDB, but it's very unsure if they are willing to do that.

That depends. Do you use DMARC? If yes, remove that (or temporary remove it) and see if the issue persists. I would start to check the headers from the mail you received in Protonmail so you can investigate exactly at which point the issue occurs. My good guess is DMARC because of DKIM failing...

It depends on what you want. We just run Almalinux 9 which is EOL in 2032. It more that MariaDB and MySQL will be EOL next year (MariaDB in june) which might be a decision maker. Everything else will still work, so there is still time to move on to a regular subscribtion. I don't know how long...

Again, that is not from the admin backup/restore command. That is a user backup. Admin backup/transfer backups are not named like that. This is admin user level backup.

I know, the highest number which I've encountered in the logs was version 100. I'm blocking everything below version 115. But I don't use mod_security. @johannes I use this line in my .htaccess but it might get to my httpd-includes.conf with the other bad bots if other sites get attacked too...

Isn't granular another word for "detailed"? Because yes it's on or off. Off is the old way, I'm not native English and so don't understand what difference granular would be. As far as I understood Shanti was not aware he could easily put it off again, but ofcourse I could be wrong due to this...