Search results

Please only English here, we don't understand Polish. So we should not be the ones using Google translate as you have the problem. If you can't do it yourself I would suggest to hire somebody to check and fix it for you. Check one of these company's for example...

We can't do a lot with that picture. Have you done what is asked in there? Checked the server log?

Probably it's present in that file but I ment what I said so in DA itself. I'm not a favorite of changing files themselve if things can be changed via the panel. Yep, that's what I ment with the domain options, domain setup. :) Glad to see you fixed it. You're welcome. ;)

Check the option in domain options in DA itself to redirect to www or to domain or none. It might be set to www.

It was mentioned in the docs though, but I agree they can better post that instruction on the same page instead of placing the link there.

If it's compromised then you have to check that either a hacker had root access or the admin account has been compromised. When admin creates a site, then the index.html file is pulled from this directory: /home/admin/domains/default/ for a reseller this is kind of the same...

Also possible, disabling auto_updatese in csf.conf and restarting csf will remove that cron automatically for you. However this still does not remove the csget cron in /etc/cron.daily which the question is about and is still running every day. It only does a version check on the old url, but...

You mean 10 per user. :) However this is not really true. You can devide it this way, but the first part is correct. It's 20 domains per license. You can also choose to have 19 domains on 1 user and 1 domain on another user, or even don't use a second user and you have all 20 domains...

It's possible in certain ways for hackers to get to the different domains on the same user account depending on the hack. This is not just limited to Directadmin. Normally hackers can not simply get to domains from other users.

You are correct, the CSF update cron is removed, but the csget not only exists and runs but is also pointing to the old download site of CSF.

Thanks. Goes a bit too far for my knowledge and I'm already reading the line like "be aware of truncation attacks". If possible I rather leave things alone. However, so 1.1.1 and earlier did not handle it correctly and now the new version does so we got a load of errors. But then these errors...

In this case, can't be fixed so only solution is ignore (which is why I put topic to solved). Indeed logs will always have some useless lines, but these are a massive amount useless lines, otherwise I wouldn't have bothers. But a lot is irritating to me. It's just like how I use logs. I...

Yes that's correct. So that is the reason why I asked, because specifically was written "this user" and not "all users" or "users" which made me wonder if it could be a wrong permission issue no the users homedir in some way or something similar. Which would wonder me too as Clamd is normally...

Sorry Eva, but I don't have any trust in GPT or AI answers as often they have errors in their answers and are not always 100% accurate. At least I've seen that a couple of times. Which is the reason I rather ask it here. However it contains some interesting sentence which I will quote next...

Only that user and no problem with other users?

Thank you. That would be a good solution if it were just warnings. But when something's wrong, one would like to see errors and these are real error notices. So I don't think it would be wise to disable the error loggings. Maybe to another file but then I can also just keep it as is. However...

Oh great... not. :( So I presume you have the same issue on your RHEL 9 servers then? Yes I can ignore it, but I don't like that much errors in my logfiles. I tends to give the impression something is wrong while it's not. Which is a bad thing because as you found out this was not happening on...

Hello Dries. Thanks for answering but that is not the case, this is happening with lots of clients on all servers. As you can see in my first message, it happened to a mail I send too, and I do have everything in perfect order. And what is wondering me most is that the error came -after- the...

Anybody a clue on how to fix these errors? I do also need plain pass authentication on port 587 so I need that custom line.

Yes. I've also read in the docs or changelog that even if they exist, they will be automatically removed after a certain amount of time. It's just irritating it generates so many errors in the log, gives the impression something is wrong. So I wonder if no change can be made that if not...