Search results

Didn't CSF work with nftables already? I thought it did and the only issue was that ipset would not be working anymore with CSF on newer OS. Without ipset things are working fine. So i also don't see any reason to change to fail2ban which (if I'm correct) didn't do any developping anymore since...

Yep, already blocked that one, there will be more. I just totally blocked google groups for the time being. It doesn't seem that any customer is making use of Google groups on our servers at this moment.

I agree with Zerg, it's not a panels task to decide if a user can make maximum or minimum changes to their website or files. I've encountered situations where I had to change permissions recursively of files. Extracting files sometimes also might give wrong permissions or imports maybe. They...

Don't know, maybe it was a temporary issue or I managed to do something wrong. Tried it again, this first: Can't pot it, I keep getting a forum error, very odd... it's the wget gode for the key anyway. then the other two commands. Either temp issue or I still managed to do something wrong...

Thank you. I tried again and hen it fails on GPG. So I tried with that wget line to import the GPG key, that goes fine. Then using that command with the gpg key to install again, same error.

I had a look on the site and read this: But there is no channel.d directory so I created it and put the config file in there. Will that be taken and updated automatically? Don't I need to activate that "channel.d" directory inclusion in Spamassassin somewhere? And read this: However... if I...

Yes but: As he said: I'm using the same method, out of Spamassin and into the exim.strings.conf.custom because you don't need to use them twice (will cause blocks sooner) and less work for Spamassassin if they are blocked earlier. I'm interested in that answer too. :)

Correct but there are a lot of things in the feedback section waiting. Better backup has status planned. I know they are completely rebuilding DA so every version you see new things, so my good guess is that the feedback stuff is set to a lower priority until the major changes they want to do...

I'm using Spamassassin. Today one other spam message came through to my client, via google, not google groups. Just again another chinese domain.

Be aware if it's Plesk, because that has the same owner as CP, so price raises are to be expected. ;)

I wouldn't like that to remove it completely. Admin and reseller changable is a must imho. It's not that difficult currently, the popup shows the default option which they can and will easily choose. Except for the exceptions ofcourse. In the old days we also did not have many users wanting...

They are getting more. Today a customer of mine also received 6 spam mails from that yinoce.com group. So now I blocked that domain and for the time being I also blocked google groups.

Good choice. Earlier on Debian used /var/log/syslog and then one could just change /var/log/messages to /var/log/syslog in the csf.conf file and restart csf and lfd and things were fine. However since Debian 12, the Syslog is replaced by journalctl. Seems the Debian devs forgot that some...

Try via a ticket or reopen ticket if you have one. Sometimes they close automatically after a couple of days.

Best is to ask your how for support. This forum is intended only for support to Directadmin license holders, so admins and resellers, not hosting customers. Also reason for this is that your host can change the configuration settings. Seems what you did was correct. Not the fastdirectadmin.com...

I report -every- spam mail I get this way via Spamcop, they all go to Google abuse too. So if they get enough complaints maybe they will thing about some better security for adding 3rd party mail addresses to groups.

That would indeed be a good explanation. I'm using Spamassassin, not going over to rspamd soon, so maybe there will be some kind of fix too. Until now it's quiet since I've blocked the originating domains which are abusing google for their spam.

But those are easy to block. I think it's whitespread and a lot of us will soon encounter these.

Yes exactly that is what I was wondering about too, hence my question how that is possible. The only thing I can think of is that the abused address is making use of external mailserver from Google and/or has forwards to Google groups or MS mail addresses.

Oke so then it's just check which domains are non-google and non-microsoft and block these, because I don't only had the ones mentioned here but a lot more. I presume those (hacked) accounts then make use of Gmail or Microsoft since the customer gets them from on of those and not directly from...