Search results

Yes, so why does that not happen on server 1 then? Because there it's exactly the same. I'm wondering about these lines because these are causing the issue: Server 1: <dkim> <domain>mycompany.nl</domain> Server 2: <dkim> <domain>server2.seconddomain.nl</domain> So why is...

Oke I'm fed up now. System messages from 1 server do not give any issues on the google reports. Disposition "none" and the rest passes. On the other server, they go into quarantaine every time, which is odd because I setup the servers the same way, but I can't find the issue or I'm looking...

Also for stable channel? Nice! Then we can update and remove the custom setting.

In that case....What about the strings.conf.custom and variables.conf.custom file, will these still work? Or do we need another method now to adjust certain values we have customized in there?

As stated before, the reason is that the mails are too big and therefor not scanned by Spamassassin, my score was already set to 10. That's also the reason that only a few big mails came through amongst with the chinacvcn.com mail too which was 6M in my case. A stronger rule will most certainly...

Yes right, thank you... I didn't see that there as it was not checked because it was bigger than the 2046K I setup it stated in the last line. I now removed the limit completely as we don't need it anymore because with the next DA update this limit will be removed anyway. Then also these bigger...

Yes I did that last time when I also changed the SA values, I've got this now in the variables.conf.custom file: EASY_SPF_PASS == -5 EASY_DKIM_PASS == -5 Since nowadays all hosters use correct SPF and DKIM I'm thinking of totally disabling bonus points for these values to 0. Where exactly did...

Today again Google groups spam mail in spite of the spamassassin setting. @bwty-sports.com

They might have removed it from the docs. Look for brute_force_notice_ip.sh for example. Might be older but still working. Ah wait... I found the github link again which has a lot more options and more up to date. https://github.com/poralix/directadmin-bfm-csf/

Yes that's the fun of still using CSF. We have the CSF clustering option in place, if one gets blocked on 1 server, they get blocked on almost all servers (the ones we want added in the cluster). However I do understand wht you're saying. But using an attack with another ip can always be done...

There is also Fail2ban which also is not really developped anymore. Fail2ban and CSF/LFD where already there a long time ago and we installed that ourselves. CSF had won the "battle" because it was better than Fail2ban. At a certain point DA more or less integrated but it's not a requirement...

Stop without answering? Try replying again to your ticket and say you answered their question and you are still waiting for their answer and to unlock port 25.

Just to hook in on this. For these two it's exactly the same in cPanel en they also created an own fork for CSF with no vision at the moment and no real changes in the files. So even with paying a lot more for support and stuff, they are not doing better on this than DA.

You're correct, there was another thread where alternatives were shown and some new discussed, I pointed to the wrong one but anyway, this one is running further so never mind. :)

That depends what you're using. SMTP is nowadays mostly used via port 587 and 465, your mail client uses that to send mail to your server or an external mail service. But if you want your Directadmin server to send and receive your mail, then port 25 needs to be open incoming and outgoing...

I wonder about that too. This could just as well be spoken about in the other thread which he -did- see. https://forum.directadmin.com/threads/csf-future-on-directadmin-%E2%80%94-where-do-we-stand-6-months-after-the-shutdown.82025/ No need to start a new one about the same.

There are 2 things which you need for mail to work. 1.) When using Cloudlfare, the mail DNS records should not be proxied but set to DNS Only. This goes for mail, MX, smtp and so on. 2.) You require to have port 25 open incoming and outgoing, best is to doublecheck that for example to telnet to...

I do a lot of things and they all help. Something like you say I don't know the code for, but we don't get spam floods luckily. :) So it's almost never 10 messages within a few minutes. Also a reason why I protect users in other ways. Due to the countermeasuers like using good RBL's, blocking...

I don't use AI, don't really trust that yet. But I report every spam to Spamcop, and then it's also quite easy to see where it's coming from and how they are using it and often best way to block it.

As was the case with CSF/LFD in the beginning, so that should not be a big issue. :) But it's nice to hear you build something which works great for you. I probably won't test it on the production servers, but will have a look at it when Github is loading a bit faster then it's doing right now.