Search results

Or just add one of these in the first line of the /etc/resolv.conf file. In case NetworkManager influence is disabled by you.

Normally Directadmin installation should do all this if it's not present. Since Almalinux 10 is supported I suggest sending in a ticket for this.

Even on Ubuntu higher than version 22? Because as of 24 that seems changed according to the link above.

Yes I wondered because I didn't see that error in his screenshot. B.t.w. I got that same lasiness too now since I got used to that command :D

I always use: cd /usr/local/directadmin/custombuild so without colon behind the cd, so not cd: /usr/local/directadmin/custombuild maybe in ubuntu this doens't matter, but in Alma I get an error doing it like this.

Oeps, no sorry, it's incoming only indeed. Incoming for an ip in csf.ignore yes if I'm correct. But I forgot we're talking outgoing traffic here.

No that is incorrect, it's not working together. If the port is changed via port setting, you don't need to remove 22 either in CSF. I also got both 22 and custom port open to trick attackers into the firewall. Port is not an addition to 22 but replacement. A connection to 22 wil just be refused...

That is because it has to do with the CT_INTERVAL. So if you have the CT_INTERVAL too high, and it's possible for them to make 1000 connections before the CT_INTERVAL time is passed, then a 1000 can pass. Because the CT_LIMIT only scans every CT_INTERVAL time.

Exactly how did you do that? Because it seems something went wrong at that point. Can you check the /usr/local/directadmin/custombuild/options.conf file and display the first 10 lines you have in there about php? You also could try these commands as root: da build update da build all or if...

Nothing changed until now. DA only has a migration option from cPanel to DA, nothing else, not even Plesk to DA. ;)

Yes it's a known problem. Also at cPanel they have a lot of issues with that in such way that cPanel themselves even wrote a manual on how to disable doing queries for validity by Spamassassin. We got a whole thread about that from last march too...

Yep, sometimes you can find quite nice servers there for a very low price. We run all our servers with Hetzner, some in Finland and some in Germany, never any complaints.

No I think this is part of the same bug. You have to create the domain first and then create a solo DNS record. Or create a solo DNS record but if you afterwards create a domain it could cause a conflict with DNS records, so probably it's refused for that reason. But I'm not sure, I never tested...

I do that too but still DA has the bug (or at least still at the beginning of this year) that no hostname entry was made in DNS administration, or hostname was made but no /etc/virtual/server.domain.com entry. I don't remember exactly but it was either one or both of these. Probably because of...

Maybe DigitalOcean better but at that price one can find good VPS about everywhere. OVH is not really good against spammers. We got so many from there we blocked 2 complete OVH cloud ranges. You can just as well choose Hetzner Cloud then. There are many out there. Contabo depends, some have a...

The hostname issue again. To me that is a a bug. If you specify the hostname then a hostname entry in DNS adminstration should be made including A records and entry's in the /etc/virtual directory for the hostname.

I also mentioned them before in post #69 as you could see. Because they are just a cheap and good VPS provider. I just said "or another good cheap vps provider" because I don't really want to benefit them against maybe other good ones. @DrWizzle is right and we also used them once a while...

From one side yes. From the other side no. Seems our ISP also has this blocked incoming for security reasons. Because they can't be sure their customers configure it the correct way and then it might be abused for DDOS or other kind of attacks. So after years of having it open, they decided to...

You can find it in the docs. Brute force log scanner: Turns ON ability to have DirectAdmin scan service logs for any brute force login attempts on a server (dovecot, exim, proftpd, sshd). So only scans logs for login attempts to those services. Brute force monitor: First started as monitor to...

Yes, but they created the wrong one. They created PTR record for elektrikakademi.com. name while it should have been for your hostname so the server.metiselektrik.com name. Unless you changed your hostname again, but I guess not. Yes locally maybe, but externally the port is still closed. I...