Search results

Yes if it would add something, but there is nothing F2B can do what CSF can not do.

Most likely this problem is caused by both Exim and Spamassasin checking mail on those RBL lists, which should not be the case because then you get these kind of blocks. So you have to exclude them from one of them. Now Exim is already checking the DNSWL list so you can exclude that from...

That wouldn't make sense because that is more of an opinion. Most would say like I do, CSF has all that F2B can do so F2B is useless if you want to have good security. Others would swear to F2B and for small private servers F2B can be a bit lighter, but lot less functionality and fail2ban is...

Thank you, updated all!

I second that. I didn't even know it was in there but I know several people talking and asking about it, so maybe it's just in to give people who want that as a choice, just like before the webmail versions (or maybe they are still in).

You can check with sudo dnf check-update to see if there even are kernel updates already, which is not the case. Once kernel updates will be released you can issue your command to update the kernel, you have to reboot the server afterwards. If you never updated a kernel before, then I would...

None imho. CSF is more enhanced (more options), so way better. Fail2ban is in fact a bit different and just does scanning logs for port intrusion and bans them, makes it a bit lighter. CSF is a bit more extended and does not only what Fail2ban does, but also does complete firewalling stuff which...

Indeed, on our servers it's also default and not modified OS, values are 0 here too, thank you! Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS just had a kernel update but the values are still the same, mctcp still enabled.

I wonder what takes so long for Ubuntu then as that is also Debian based (Debian derative). As far as the rest: And today, October 31, still nothing at least as far as RHEL goes. Seems this can be temporarily more or less protected manually until the kernel fix. I read this on Facebook on a...

You can always use the contact form or e-mail on the directadmin side for these kind of things. Forum support is for the technical support. However, Like you should be able to cancel it like @ericosman already explained.

This worked great! Unfortunately I had to disable it again, since some company's, like backup4all (and probably others) have choosen to use the Google mailserver which was blocking support mails.

That. Modern licenses will support RHEL 10 based systems and newer Debian and derative systems. I would say convert the legacy licenses to modern licenses then you can upgrade all. Price when converting/upgrading to modern licenses is half of normal price so 15/month.

I don't want to say in order but last couple of weeks it's fairly quiet.

Yes that's what I ment with that I got it back from the mailer daemon. It's a bounced message that had the txt file with the quote I posted and the original LFD message was attached. My memory didn't want to remember that it was called bounced. When I look in that header of that attachment...

Well I only got the original e-mail as attachment from the mailer daemon from the other server so only that info was in the headers unfortunately. The queues I checked already and nothing waiting, so I have to wait until it happens again and then quickly see if I can catch the mail. Thanks...

Yes that is the odd thing. On the LFD messages that come through, they are fine and have X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-). The header of the one I got back does not show anything strangely enough. Maybe stripped by the original server which mailer daemon sends that back to me as attachment. I've also...

Ah buggers... I checked with nano and since it was a few seconds difference I missed that it was 2 messages, also because I only got a return of 1 refused message. I missed the message id's even when looking back when you wrote it was different ones. I mistakenly thought the second one was the...

I don't shoot, but you mentioned this and I already stated and prooved that this was fine, so I thought you might have missed that, sorry. Indeed it looks from ESF as you say. Don't want to debate that either. Since SPF, DKIM and rDNS work correctly which is prooved at my side with any other...

As stated, all things are good, rDNS, SPF and DKIM are present. Other LFD mails are coming through. So it's not either one of them. If that would be the case the other LFD mails of that server would also be blocked but that is not happening. The Exim logs don't see anything extra then what is...

I check several servers and normally my mail address is in the alias so I also get root mail. In this case the sendering server is a cPanel server and some LFD mails are refused now. But I can't find out why as they are not on any blacklist. Reporting MTA somehosting is the cpanel server...