Search results

Ah ofcourse then @DrWizzle is correct. It's a php module but php does not .htaccess so that only works in combination with mod_htscanner of apache... LOL I didn't think far enough.

I don't see any errors in there. Only see build succesfully. The php_htscanner is a php extension, so that should not matter if I'm correct. https://docs.directadmin.com/webservices/php/php-extensions.html#installing-extensions You're probably confused with the apache mod_htscanner, which is...

There are not any /custom directory's with content. These directory's are made to create custom content if required. If a custom directory does not exist where it is required then you can create it yourself. So you can just to what it says, edit that file (and so creating a new file) and put...

Yes that's normal. They only show up on that list once you removed them. So to remove an item, list say if you have php 8.1 as your second PHP version, then go to Options and then set that PHP version to "no". Then go to Remove and then you can remove it from there. A lot of us rather work via...

That depends. By default it's limited to 2. But you can add a 3rd one. https://docs.directadmin.com/other-hosting-services/dns/general.html#how-to-add-a-3rd-nameserver-ns3 As for Directslave, I don't use the scripts, found something in there and replied to Ericosman's post, just can find the...

Out of curiosity. How do you get to 4x $5? You only need 1 extra DNS server right? Because if you only use it for DNS you can use it for unlimited domains DNS. Be aware, it's an either/or situation. If you start using the personal license with domains (or 2 accounts, not sure anymore) then you...

Yes kind of. In fact the "free" DNSonly is already calculated in the price of cPanel. Direct admin does not have any free DNS itself. However, it doesn't say so but you can use the Personal Plus 5/month license for unlimited DNS if you use it for DNS only. For that price you're still nowhere...

Probably yes, but unsure from the latest reply (other users) and lots of people reading stuff like this, so that's why I posted the warning to doublecheck. Better be safe than sorry.

If it's Centos you could do cat /etc/redhat-release for the specific version but wow that is indeed very old as you said.

I would be carefull with that command, because if you have a custom -directory- there (which can very well be the case) then you would move the directoryname to custom.bak and customisations would not work anymore. So anyone reading this, doublecheck that it's a file and not a directory.

OMG they are ISP's doing that too nowadays? Wow... they should start trying that here in our country, they would have hell to pay. :ROFLMAO:

You can find it in Dutch here, on the right side under "beslisboom" https://ecp.nl/pps-eevidence/

No problem there. Because I will never do anything "just in case" and I value the privacy of my customers very high. So even in Dutch cases they have got to have a good decent court order otherwise I won't do anything. And I won't do anything out of myself anyway either. I'm just a bit worried...

Yes but well.... problem is that emails are stored on the server so you can't say you don't have that. That is a wrong translation. It says "general data retention" and I know how governments work. So this means they can ask for specific data retention for example emails, just not general so...

Well I don't fully agree to that. You can see they can ask for content as shown in the quote in the first message. So I can't agree to the any extra, and as of yet I didn't find any "we don't have that info option" but I did see a "you are expected to provide that information by law once...

Well... I'm almost sure the csf=yes is added directly when they fully integrated it in DA. Before that, we had to install CSF manually and then you could have DA use custom scripts for example for the bruteforce integration. There was no csf= setting in DA at that time yet. That's the only...

Great, thank you for confirming, this will for sure help us and others if/when running in to the same issue. Thanks! (y)

Yes the hosters have to keep that in mind. It's warned 2 threads here about this situation could be a security risk. It's up to hosters to keep their 3rd party tools and configuration safe enough. The csf=no is a manual configuration setting, not a DA automated setting. So one should always be...

Well... you could try using the company phone number, that's also a means for fast contact, maybe they will accept that too.

As far as I understand it now, we only have to start working on this once we get a court order from some country. This order should provide the conservation time. Accessing content but not limited to customers email is a privacy violation for sure. So we can't do anything until we receive an...