DirectAdmin on Cloudlinux 9

[Stije]

106 for 10.6 because that is the latest that is stated in CL docs says is supported by governor (do not blame DA)...

We use 10.11 with governor. Who says you cannot use 10.11?

10.11 and dbgoverner works for a while now.

see also

CloudLinux | Changelog

CloudLinux OS and components changelog website. Here you can find the actual information about the package updates.

changelog.cloudlinux.com

 

[DanielP]

We use 10.11 with governor. Who says you cannot use 10.11?

10.11 and dbgoverner works for a while now.

see also

CloudLinux | Changelog

CloudLinux OS and components changelog website. Here you can find the actual information about the package updates.

changelog.cloudlinux.com

because they do not changed their docs - I do what every normal person shoudl do - read the docs and follow them - there it stops to 106 (still)

CloudLinux OS components

 

[Zhenmue]

because they do not changed their docs - I do what every normal person shoudl do - read the docs and follow them - there it stops to 106 (still)

CloudLinux OS components

View attachment 8155

yep, their docs are outdated, but we can confirm trough changelog it's supported https://changelog.cloudlinux.com/cl-MariaDB1011

 

[Ohm J]

that's is just a docs, you should focus on change logs.

sometime docs might outdated. because software developer always focus on update their software without makechange the docs and between 10.6 and 11 doesn't change too much on Govenor version required.

 

[deltaB]

@deltaB in another threads people mentioned that they already using successfully CL9.

Hey thanks, good to know it's working for people.

it's more the official support we need, as we can't run it in production until both CloudLinux and DirectAdmin say it's offically supported.

This is saying Rocky/Alma is supported on v9, and CL isn't mentioned at all...

Overview | Directadmin Docs

DirectAdmin Knowledge Base

docs.directadmin.com

 

[Zhenyapan]

@deltaB its in progress now, but you can vote for it to make more attention/priority for CL team.

https://features.cloudlinux.com/tabs/11-in-progress

 

[deltaB]

@deltaB its in progress now, but you can vote for it to make more attention/priority for CL team.

https://features.cloudlinux.com/tabs/11-in-progress

Thanks, added my +1

 

[deltaB]

Good news, incase you missed it, it's now officially supported https://blog.cloudlinux.com/announcing-support-for-cloudlinux-9-with-directadmin

 

[Waqass]

Strangely it still showed me this error
"
[root@srv ~]# sh cldeploy -i
Last available CloudLinux release: 9.4
Current system release: 9.4
The installed control panel "directadmin" is not officially supported in combination with the CloudLinux OS version 9.
To continue the conversion anyway, you may run cldeploy with --skip-os-check option,
but do so at your own risk. There are no guarantees that the system will be stable or functional after the conversion."

I still proceeded with the setup because I have already spent so much time in setting up this new server and can't go back to setting up the older os again.

 

[gate2vn]

You can still proceed, DA can run on CL9.

However, make sure you will install kernel 5.14.0-427.33.1.el9_4.x86_64 after that and use as default kernel. Higher versions have a bug which can crash your server, if one account is using more than its limitation in a short time.

 

[Yoh]

You can still proceed, DA can run on CL9.

However, make sure you will install kernel 5.14.0-427.33.1.el9_4.x86_64 after that and use as default kernel. Higher versions have a bug which can crash your server, if one account is using more than its limitation in a short time.

Could you please describe how the crash server manifests?

For a long time, I used 5.14.0-427.31.1.el9_4.x86_64 and encountered sudden spikes in the load average to 100 and higher. During these periods, the server stopped responding to requests. However, everything returned to normal after 5-10 minutes. Recently, I reverted to 5.14.0-427.22.1.el9_4.x86_64 and haven't observed this issue anymore.

 

[gate2vn]

Check in syslog if you have OOM messages. Was it happening with one account at a time? Could be different accounts, but when the problem happened, only one account could crash the whole server, even its resource limitations are not much. CL confirmed the bug, but it has been a while without a fix.

In your case, you used 5.14.0-427.31.1.el9_4.x86_64, it might be another reason, I am not aware the bug happening with that kernel.

 

[Yoh]

Thank you for the clarification. I checked the logs, and OOM occurred twice in the past month for a single user. My issues likely have a different cause. However, I haven’t been able to identify any patterns for a long time. The issue occurs suddenly and at different times, regardless of the number of requests to the server.