I'm confused about what the new license system means for me

[floyd]

I have a client who helped me with some advertising and seo and so forth. I didn't have any money to give him so I gave him free hosting. 17 years later I am still giving him free hosting even though he hasn't done anything for me for the last 16 years. I honor my agreements.

 

[Richard G]

You have a server, your hosting does not cost you anything extra in development or personel for that client, I even doubt if it cost you extra, I also have such customer. Apples and pears comparison again.

 

[floyd]

What the agreement was for is not relevant at all. The apples to apples part is the fact that I made an agreement with somebody and it did not work out so well for me but I still honored it. DirectAdmin made an agreement with me and it didn't work out so well for them and they reneged on it. Again. It doesn't matter what the service was or what the product is. It can be for anything. Doesn't matter. What matters is a person's word.

I've come to the conclusion that you just like to debate people. I am not in the debate business so I will not see any more of your posts.

 

[DavidK]

You have a server, your hosting does not cost you anything extra in development or personel for that client, I even doubt if it cost you extra, I also have such customer. Apples and pears comparison again.

My man you just defend directadmin, regardless of any logic.
Directadmin is actively developing the newest version RIGHT NOW. It would cost them nothing to include the original customers even if they continue to sell monthly licenses for additional servers to the SAME CUSTOMERS. I already laid out how they have lost hundreds of dollars in sales from me monthly. The other customer mentioning hosting actually had more costs or at the very least the same costs. Hosting cost in bandwidth and server resources. He met his obligation because of integrity, not because he couldn't have pocketed more money to cover those costs. Even if Directadmin had similar resource "costs" they still would have made more money with new licenses by meeting their obligations.

It's not apple and pears. You just don't want to see logic and the truth.
Directadmin stole. They didn't advertise "Lifetime, but we mean lifetime as in whenever we want to kill it.".
No you know why? Because they wouldn't have sold any licenses that way! They happily pocketed millions on a lie and then decided to grab more money, feeling entitled to it later. Instead of having integrity and meeting their original obligations. I don't really care how "cheap" they make future products. I would have paid more on future licenses if they had met their original obligations. But they didn't do that and I don't give more money to people that steal.

And you say my 3 year warranty is apples and pears too. But you know what? IF I was stupid enough to offer a lifetime warranty I would have honored it too, to this day. Because I actually believe in delivering what I sold.. small business and all.

 

[DavidK]

Well then you loose your money at some other place or DA wouldn't have earned any money from you anyway if you choose a free panel.

Keeping up lifetime licenes is not sustainable for a business, there is a reason why they all stopped with them.

You are "assuming" people are using free panels to deflect reality.. when in fact people are using other paid panels as in my case.
Time to admit the truth to yourself instead of lying to yourself. And even if people do move on to "free" panels they probably wouldn't have if Directadmin had integrity, so it was lost sales anyway.

 

[Richard G]

regardless of any logic.

You don't show logic, I try to show you some company logic but you don't see it.

when in fact people are using other paid panels as in my case.

Only few as there are not many paid panels out there, and those who use paid panels will also use DA, as soon as they won't get any updates anymore.
You're really BS'sing about DA. I was also mad. But you should grow some business insight and see something like they did with the lifetime licenses is just not sustainable, no matter what.

IF I was stupid enough to offer a lifetime warranty I would have honored it too, to this day. Because I actually believe in delivering what I sold.. small business and all.

which prooves my point. So you rather go broke than break your "honor". LoL Totally unrealistic.

It would cost them nothing to include the original customers

You're still missing the point that they need enough selling of the monthley licences to keep this up and you just assume this is the case. The fact that they had to change things in spite of the fact a lot of cP users came over (which again used lifetime licenses) shows you have no clue on how this works.
You're just as the rest who keep arguing and complaining, most professional business understand this is not sustainable after so long a period. Trying to get as cheap as possible so you don't use DA but a cheaper panel, good luck with that and hope they are oke and no backdoors anymore, because they had in the past, and not a few. It's not about any honor, it's about irritation that you can't work for fee anymore for much longer.

Since you totally do not go in to my arguments about the other panels stopping lifetime and WHMCS and fact that business can't "honor things" until they are broke, that is missing insight.
Also you're making statements liket he very exaggerated price of 500 which you also did not respond to.

As far as I'm concerned this discussion is over, we're repeating the same arguments and you don't go into decent counter arguments, you just want to be right that DA is not honoring things and they steal and that is BS and slander as nothing is stolen.

 

[Ohm J]

free panel will come with limit update.... Like hestiacp, sometime broken, sometime bugged and required some decade times to fixed the bug
But use with small project is fine, that you don't need the frequency updating.