Solved Quotas in DA are incorrect

[CrazyFrog]

Hi everyone,

We are getting some messages such as:

User -redacted- has used up 4.98% of their bandwidth and 95.0% of their allocated disk space

In the example you can see that DA thinks they use 950MB out of 1000MB. (See first attachment)

But when I actually check out their home directory, they use much more than 950MB, in fact they have 5.8GB of mail! (See second attachment)

I tried to do the following but that did not help: echo 'action=tally&value=all' >> /usr/local/directadmin/data/task.queue

Anyone has the golden tip? I would like the DA quotas to reflect the actually used files on the filesystem. (I guess it will cause me some work, to get clients to upgrade their plans, but I hope it will pay for itself ?)

My OS is Ubuntu 18.04 LTS.
DirectAdmin is at 1.63.5.

Thanks!
CrazyFrog

 

[Richard G]

That is odd. I don't have that issue. Quata's are correct when checking the file system.

Are quota's working correctly at your server?
Did you check this? There are some links to debug guides:

Filesystem and quotas | Directadmin Docs

DirectAdmin Knowledge Base

docs.directadmin.com

 

[CrazyFrog]

Hi Richard, Thanks for your reply.

I tried repquota and it also reports the incorrect values!

# repquota / | grep [username] [username] -- 976376 1024000 1126400 2977 0 0

It's all around 1GB, but the homedir is 5GB. And I checked a bit inside the maildir that the files are actually owned by the user (find . -not -user username)

I'll try the tip from the documentation: quotaoff -a; quotacheck -avugm; quotaon -a

Now repquota is correct!

# repquota / | grep [username] [username] +- 6080068 1024000 1126400 6days 13701 0 0

DirectAdmin still displays the old numbers so I am going to run the following and wait a while...

echo 'action=tally&value=all' >> /usr/local/directadmin/data/task.queue

Now the quotas are shown correctly in DirectAdmin.

Thanks! ?

 

[Richard G]

You're welcome.
Can you please edit your first post and change the prefix to "solved".
Thank you.

 

[sufiyanshaikh]

Is it safe to run quotaoff -a; quotacheck -avugm; quotaon -a
What this command exactly do?

After executing the command, I got the below warning:
quotacheck: Your kernel probably supports journaled quota but you are not using it. Consider switching to journaled quota to avoid running quotacheck after an unclean shutdown.

 

[Richard G]

What this command exactly do?

It's safe to run that yes. It turns all quota off (hence the -a) then checks the quota and after that turns all quota on again.

The warning you got you can ignore, it's not a warning it's a notice, so only to let you know, not that something is wrong.

You can read about the differences in the answer given here:

Difference between journaled and plain quota

I am trying to set up quotas on a filesystem and I am getting the famous message: quotacheck: Your kernel probably supports journaled quota but you are not using it. Consider switching to journ...

unix.stackexchange.com

 

[sufiyanshaikh]

It's safe to run that yes. It turns all quota off (hence the -a) then checks the quota and after that turns all quota on again.]

Thanks for the information