nobaloney
NoBaloney Internet Svcs - In Memoriam †
You should have only one reverse record per IP#.
While the protocol allows for multiple reverse records per IP, some programs don't know how to handle them.
They won't just "work" intelligently as you'd expect. Whoever looks up the IP# using either dig or nslookup will see either a list of all or some of the reverse resolutions, or get an error, depending on how the resolver s/he's using works.
And unless you've got an entire C-class or a reasonably sized delegated subnet, you can do reverse DNS all you won't, but the Internet at large won't see your records anyway, because most upstreams won't delegate the authority to you.
Jeff
While the protocol allows for multiple reverse records per IP, some programs don't know how to handle them.
They won't just "work" intelligently as you'd expect. Whoever looks up the IP# using either dig or nslookup will see either a list of all or some of the reverse resolutions, or get an error, depending on how the resolver s/he's using works.
And unless you've got an entire C-class or a reasonably sized delegated subnet, you can do reverse DNS all you won't, but the Internet at large won't see your records anyway, because most upstreams won't delegate the authority to you.
Jeff