could be, but I'd like to:I think trying to use multi-server is a mistake for this process.
- get an automated IP change process.
- enjoy this feature in the future as well.

could be, but I'd like to:I think trying to use multi-server is a mistake for this process.
get an automated IP change process.
yes, you understood me right, and yes, I know that in a client-per-client process it's easy to modify the IP.I guess I am not understanding you. Especially if you are only doing one user at a time its very easy to modify the user to use the new ip.
multi-server is not interfering the move process, it's just not doing its job properly.If you turn off multi-server then problem solved.
correct, and will be that way until the last client is moved (!).DNS is currently hosted on the old server, correct?
Turn off multi-server. You do not need it unless you have DNS hosted on two different servers already. But this would have nothing to do with the new server.
Change the ip for the user on the old server to the new ip.
he will be hosted directly on the new server, but still be using old DNS (meaning NS1&NS2.DOMAIN.COM).
yes, that would be correct.Solution: Change the ip for ns2.domain.com to the new server.
The ns1 will not answer for the new domains for the new client so the request will then inquire of ns2. The request may actually inquire of ns2 first since there is no primary and secondary anymore.
ns2 will not answer for the old domains for the old clients who have not been moved yet. Same situation as above.
By changing the ip for ns2 to that of the new server you satisfy the requests of old clients who have not been moved yet and the new clients on the new server. The old clients that have been moved will been served by either ns1 or ns2. You just have to make sure the ip address is correct on both servers.
By the way this is not a theory. I am currently doing this for the last week and probably for at least another week.
http://hossanrose.com/linux/?p=51yes, that would be correct.
but if the Zone transfer would work as described, this wouldn't be an issue at all - and therefor a bug...![]()
yes, that would be correct.
but if the Zone transfer would work as described, this wouldn't be an issue at all - and therefor a bug...![]()
I'm not trying to disprove your method - thanks for that, I will probably use it, since the DA way doesn't work...I am just trying to give you a proven method that will work. While we have discussed this today I have personally transfered over 100 users. Of course I wrote a script that automates the ipswap, suspend, and backup to the new server. I then have to go to the new server and restore and unsuspend. And I do several at a time.
yeah I know, that wasn't my point...That whole post is a hard way to do it.
I'm not trying to disprove your method - thanks for that, I will probably use it, since the DA way doesn't work...
I'm trying to show there's a BUG in DA...![]()
I agree with your method and as said before I will probably use it.The DA way is what I am using. That is why it is call Admin Backup/Transfer.
The only thing I am doing out of the ordinary is manually adding the new ip in the text files so that I can use the ipswap in the Modify User section. I don't want to add it through IP Management because I do not want it to actually be active on the server but I want to be able to modify users to to the ip.
That might be true. But I believe you are also trying to use muti-server in a way that it was not supposed to be used. It was not supposed to assist in any way of transferring clients that I know of.
problem solved!as for the multi-server setup, it has nothing to do with the transfer now.
it's simply not working...
Unfortunately this is not the way DNS works.The ns1 will not answer for the new domains for the new client so the request will then inquire of ns2. The request may actually inquire of ns2 first since there is no primary and secondary anymore.
ns2 will not answer for the old domains for the old clients who have not been moved yet. Same situation as above.
not the local, the remote.@MtK:
I just read your last post after my immediately previous post.
So the transfer overrides a local zone? That's actually scary.
Jeff
Unfortunately this is not the way DNS works.